| Governance Problems at Royal Dutch/Shell |  | 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies CollectionOR
 Case Details:
 
 Case Code : BSTR155
 Case Length : 17
 Pages Period : 2000 - 2005
 Organization : Royal Dutch | Shell
 Pub Date : 2005
 Teaching Note :Not Available
 Countries : UK, Netherlands
 Themes: Corporate Governance
 Industry : Petroleum and Petrochemicals
 
 To download Governance Problems at Royal Dutch/Shell case study (Case Code: BSTR155) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
| 
 Buy With PayPal
 |  
 Price:
 
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
 For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 500 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
 
 
 
 » Business Strategy Case Studies» Case Studies Collection
 » Business Strategy Short Case Studies
 » View Detailed Pricing Info
 » How To Order This Case
 » Business Case Studies
 » Case Studies by Area
 » Case Studies by Industry
 » Case Studies by Company
 
 
 
Please note:
 This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 
 
 
 Chat with us
 
 
  
 Please leave your feedback
 
 
   | 
		
| 
	       
 << Previous Introduction Contd...
	
		| 
The internal review report released by Shell on April 19, 2004, stated that the 
top managers at Shell knew about the inflated reserves for years and had been 
arguing about whether and how to lie about it to the company's shareholders. The 
controversy led to the exit of top managerial personnel and a fall in the 
company's credit ratings8. Apart from shattering investor confidence, the 
reputation of the company was also badly hit. Analysts were of the opinion that 
apart from lack of standard policies with regard to reporting and categorization 
of oil reserves; and absence of third party audits of oil reserves to ensure 
transparency, one major reason for the crisis was Shell's organizational 
structure.  |   
 |  
 They found that the bi-national Dutch/English ownership structure of Shell with 
	two boards and a Committee of Managing Directors had resulted in lower 
	accountability. Absence of clearly defined roles and responsibilities of the 
	top management made misrepresentation easier. A few analysts believed that 
	Shell would benefit greatly by changing its organizational structure so as 
	to have a single board. 
	
		|  | Background Note
		The Royal Dutch/Shell Group was formed in 1907 through the merger of the 
		assets and operations of the Netherlands-based Royal Dutch Petroleum 
		Company (RD) and the British-based Shell Transport and Trading Company (STT).
		
 The history of Shell dates back to 1833 when Marcus Samuel opened a shop 
		in London, selling sea-shells. This business quickly developed into a 
		thriving trading company which was later managed by his son, Marcus 
		Samuel Jr. His business visits to the Far East made him realize the 
		potential for supplying kerosene to be used for lighting and cooking, 
		from the developing Russian oilfields, to the large markets in China and 
		the Far East...
 |  
Excerpts>> 
 
 |